On 2/21/07, Tim Bisaillon <knightbane at hotmail.com> wrote: > >From: Ryan Bartlett <evilwins at thedigitalsoul.net> > > >I was just wondering, why 333? Why not 444, 314, 777, or 212? > > or even The Number 23? ;) > 42. Much happier. What was the question again? -- It takes a village to raise a child, but just a van and a few puppies to catch one.