[UA] This is sufficiently weird to deserve a plot
Alec Fleschner
alecfleschner at mac.com
Tue Jun 12 07:14:59 PDT 2007
But it would be cool if they developed that kind of weapon. Think of
all the possibilities if we had a gay bomb in 1994. Terrorists would
probably try and detonate one in a US city. Washington D.C. would
need to go on constant orange alert in order to make sure no one
sneaks a "dirty" gay bomb into the U.S. Congress. FEMA would need to
create guidelines in case people are caught during a gay bomb attack,
including guidelines such as "The safest place to be during a gay
bomb attack is taking a cold shower or at a fundamentalist church."
The United Nations would have to investigate Iran and North Korea to
ensure they're not developing homoerotic weaponry. Rumors would
abound of supersolders being developed in the Ukraine or the Amazon
who are ten times more heterosexual than regular soldiers. There are
so many possibilities that would just be so amusing. =)
Alec
On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:45 AM, Chris Cooper wrote:
>
> Someone in the military has a dangerously skewed
> misinterpretation of the idea of archetypes:
> "Gennelmen, it there's one and it's one of them Don't
> Ask, Don't Tell magihical homo-osexual fellas. If we
> can put him in a bomb we can wave him like a fairy -
> pardon the expession - ovah the enemy and make all his
> soldiers, ahem, interior decorohators."
>
> C, putting additional syllables where he likes.
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________
> Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative
> vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
> _______________________________________________
> UA mailing list
> UA at lists.unknown-armies.com
> http://lists.unknown-armies.com/mailman/listinfo/ua
More information about the UA
mailing list