[UA] This is sufficiently weird to deserve a plot

Alec Fleschner alecfleschner at mac.com
Tue Jun 12 07:14:59 PDT 2007


But it would be cool if they developed that kind of weapon. Think of  
all the possibilities if we had a gay bomb in 1994. Terrorists would  
probably try and detonate one in a US city. Washington D.C. would  
need to go on constant orange alert in order to make sure no one  
sneaks a "dirty" gay bomb into the U.S. Congress. FEMA would need to  
create guidelines in case people are caught during a gay bomb attack,  
including guidelines such as "The safest place to be during a gay  
bomb attack is taking a cold shower or at a fundamentalist church."  
The United Nations would have to investigate Iran and North Korea to  
ensure they're not developing homoerotic weaponry. Rumors would  
abound of supersolders being developed in the Ukraine or the Amazon  
who are ten times more heterosexual than regular soldiers. There are  
so many possibilities that would just be so amusing. =)

Alec







On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:45 AM, Chris Cooper wrote:

>
> Someone in the military has a dangerously skewed
> misinterpretation of the idea of archetypes:
> "Gennelmen, it there's one and it's one of them Don't
> Ask, Don't Tell magihical homo-osexual fellas. If we
> can put him in a bomb we can wave him like a fairy -
> pardon the expession - ovah the enemy and make all his
> soldiers, ahem, interior decorohators."
>
> C, putting additional syllables where he likes.
>
>
>
>
>        
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ______________
> Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative  
> vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
> _______________________________________________
> UA mailing list
> UA at lists.unknown-armies.com
> http://lists.unknown-armies.com/mailman/listinfo/ua



More information about the UA mailing list